Prospero, Dr. Faustus and the Search for Power

In William Shakespeares The Tempest, and Chri detailher Marlowes indemnify Faustus, Prospero and adulterate Faustus both engage in elements of the dark arts, initially to fulfill aspirational outcomes. In order to attest might, Shakespeare effectively plays with the relationships amidst tame and servant. Many characters are overly locked in a causality struggle for the control of the island, at last causing the abuse of source by some characters. Whereas, Marlowe presents the over mogul/servant relationship as a mutually ripe deal out of choice, kinda than against the will of the servant. However, while Prospero is clearly reformed at the leftover of The Tempest, Faustus is damned to hell and does not experience the treasured power that Prospero regains. This may be imputable(p) to the fact that The Tempest is a typical romance play, final result with a clichéd mirthfully ever after, whereas Marlowes Doctor Faustus is considered a tragedy due to the important char acter dying.\nThe power held by The Tempest(s) main protagonist, Prospero, is challenged by the natural islander Caliban. Caliban recognizes this, and when attempting to assassinate Prospero, he wants to suffer his books; for without them / Hes alone a sot,... This line presents Caliban as powerful, as he knows the sneaking(a) to Prosperos power, and also knows how to stop it. However, the fact that Caliban has not acted on this, even when enslaved by Prospero, that instead looks for a graven image or master shows how he needs someone to bespeak him.\nProspero is called a sot by Caliban; the word sot refers to a medieval drunkard, someone who is habitually drunk, which presents Prospero as a foolhardy character. This shows a clear fling in power between Prospero and Caliban, as the island should belong to the native Caliban, simply has been colonized by Prospero, the careless white man. What is arouse is that Caliban only insults Prospero behind his back, but in his pres en...